Alabama Hospital System and Physician Group Agree to Pay $24.5 Million to Settle Lawsuit Alleging False Claims for Illegal Medicare Referrals
qui tam Whistleblower To receive $4.41 millon of the settlement proceeds
Seattle Whistleblower Attorneys report that, Infirmary Health
System Inc. (IHS), two IHS-affiliated clinics and Diagnostic Physicians
Group P.C. (DPG) have agreed to pay the United States $24.5 million to
resolve a lawsuit alleging that they violated the False Claims Act by
paying or receiving financial inducements in connection with claims to
the Medicare program.
“Financial arrangements that compensate physicians for referrals encourage physicians to make decisions based on financial gain rather than patients’ needs,” said Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division Stuart F. Delery. “The Department of Justice is committed to preventing illegal financial relationships that undermine the integrity of our public health programs.”
The government’s suit alleged that two IHS affiliated clinics -- IMC-Diagnostic and Medical Clinic, in Mobile, and IMC-Northside Clinic, in Saraland, Alabama -- had agreements with DPG to pay the group a percentage of Medicare payments for tests and procedures referred by DPG physicians, in violation of the Physician Self-Referral Law (commonly known as the Stark Law) and the Anti-Kickback Statute. Also named in the lawsuit was Infirmary Medical Clinics P.C. (IMC), an affiliate of IHS that directly owns and operates approximately 30 clinics in the Mobile area, including the two clinics involved in this lawsuit.
The Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law are intended to ensure that a physician’s medical judgment is not compromised by improper financial incentives. The Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by federal health care programs, including Medicare. The Stark Law forbids a hospital or clinic from billing Medicare for certain service referred by physicians who have a financial relationship with the entity.
According to the government’s complaint, in 1988, IMC purchased IMC-Diagnostic and Medical Clinic from DPG and agreed to pay DPG a share of the revenues the clinics collected, including Medicare revenues from diagnostic imaging and laboratory tests. After IMC acquired the IMC-Northside Clinic in 2008, the physicians practicing there joined DPG and entered into an agreement with the same key terms as the earlier agreement with IMC-Diagnostic and Medical Clinic. The government contended that these payments were illegal kickbacks and constituted a prohibited financial relationship under the Stark Law, and that in June 2010, an attorney for DPG warned employees of both IMC and DPG that the compensation being paid to the physicians likely violated the law. Nevertheless, the agreements allegedly were neither modified nor terminated for another 18 months.
The lawsuit was originally filed by Dr. Christian Heesch, a physician formerly employed by DPG, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act. Those provisions authorize private parties to sue on behalf of the United States and to receive a portion of any recovery. The act permits the United States to intervene and take over the lawsuit, as it did in this case with respect to some of Dr. Heesch’s allegations. Dr. Heesch will receive $4.41 million as his share of the settlement.
“Today’s settlement represents a single but significant step towards achieving integrity in the administration of public health programs in this region,” said U.S. Attorney Kenyen Brown for the Southern District of Alabama. “Physicians, physician groups and other medical entities operating illegally within public health programs will be held accountable. I also commend whistle blowers like Dr. Christian Heesch, who helped bring this particular case to light.”
As part of the settlement announced today, the settling defendants have also agreed to enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), which obligates the defendants to undertake substantial internal compliance reforms and to submit its federal health care program claims to independent review for the next five years.
“Patients must know that medical advice is based on best practices, not on their provider’s bottom line,” said HHS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Derrick L. Jackson. “We are pleased these allegations are resolved and will continue to work with the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and pursue illegal, wasteful business arrangements.”
The investigation and litigation were conducted by the Justice Department’s Civil Division, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Alabama, HHS-OIG and the FBI. The claims settled by this agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.
The case is captioned U.S. ex rel. Heesch v. Diagnostic Physicians Group, P.C. et al., Civil Action No. 11-0364-KD-B (S.D. Ala.).
Source: Dept. of Justice
“Financial arrangements that compensate physicians for referrals encourage physicians to make decisions based on financial gain rather than patients’ needs,” said Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division Stuart F. Delery. “The Department of Justice is committed to preventing illegal financial relationships that undermine the integrity of our public health programs.”
The government’s suit alleged that two IHS affiliated clinics -- IMC-Diagnostic and Medical Clinic, in Mobile, and IMC-Northside Clinic, in Saraland, Alabama -- had agreements with DPG to pay the group a percentage of Medicare payments for tests and procedures referred by DPG physicians, in violation of the Physician Self-Referral Law (commonly known as the Stark Law) and the Anti-Kickback Statute. Also named in the lawsuit was Infirmary Medical Clinics P.C. (IMC), an affiliate of IHS that directly owns and operates approximately 30 clinics in the Mobile area, including the two clinics involved in this lawsuit.
The Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law are intended to ensure that a physician’s medical judgment is not compromised by improper financial incentives. The Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by federal health care programs, including Medicare. The Stark Law forbids a hospital or clinic from billing Medicare for certain service referred by physicians who have a financial relationship with the entity.
According to the government’s complaint, in 1988, IMC purchased IMC-Diagnostic and Medical Clinic from DPG and agreed to pay DPG a share of the revenues the clinics collected, including Medicare revenues from diagnostic imaging and laboratory tests. After IMC acquired the IMC-Northside Clinic in 2008, the physicians practicing there joined DPG and entered into an agreement with the same key terms as the earlier agreement with IMC-Diagnostic and Medical Clinic. The government contended that these payments were illegal kickbacks and constituted a prohibited financial relationship under the Stark Law, and that in June 2010, an attorney for DPG warned employees of both IMC and DPG that the compensation being paid to the physicians likely violated the law. Nevertheless, the agreements allegedly were neither modified nor terminated for another 18 months.
The lawsuit was originally filed by Dr. Christian Heesch, a physician formerly employed by DPG, under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act. Those provisions authorize private parties to sue on behalf of the United States and to receive a portion of any recovery. The act permits the United States to intervene and take over the lawsuit, as it did in this case with respect to some of Dr. Heesch’s allegations. Dr. Heesch will receive $4.41 million as his share of the settlement.
“Today’s settlement represents a single but significant step towards achieving integrity in the administration of public health programs in this region,” said U.S. Attorney Kenyen Brown for the Southern District of Alabama. “Physicians, physician groups and other medical entities operating illegally within public health programs will be held accountable. I also commend whistle blowers like Dr. Christian Heesch, who helped bring this particular case to light.”
As part of the settlement announced today, the settling defendants have also agreed to enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), which obligates the defendants to undertake substantial internal compliance reforms and to submit its federal health care program claims to independent review for the next five years.
“Patients must know that medical advice is based on best practices, not on their provider’s bottom line,” said HHS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Derrick L. Jackson. “We are pleased these allegations are resolved and will continue to work with the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and pursue illegal, wasteful business arrangements.”
The investigation and litigation were conducted by the Justice Department’s Civil Division, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Alabama, HHS-OIG and the FBI. The claims settled by this agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.
The case is captioned U.S. ex rel. Heesch v. Diagnostic Physicians Group, P.C. et al., Civil Action No. 11-0364-KD-B (S.D. Ala.).
Source: Dept. of Justice